Mizuno Morelia Sala Classic EU43

This is a simple scanning exercise aiming for fairness of the tolerances and set data. Of course, the Einscan professional scanner can go much further in detail. I have set a limit of 0.3 to be closest to the Revopoint. Of course, there are all the limitations of a cheap, even well-made scanner. A comparison value for all is the inability to scan a black colored object. While the Einscan scanner is able to capture the detail even of the small herbs that have got stuck in the studs. Of course I could close the meshes and continue the scan inside as well, but I repeat I kept myself neutral and impartial using the same scanning methodology and possibly the same light parameters etc. Note the difference in texture detail as well. Below I leave the scan data.
Sports shoe with studs for synthetic grass.
Mizuno Morelia Sala Classic EU43 shoe model in red. I cleaned the shoe thoroughly after finishing my rugby training. I have used two types of 3D scanners.
The first is a Shining3D EinScan H, the second a Revopoint3D POP.
Scan mode Features with texture - alignment with texture - resolution 0.3 mm, same light conditions, same rpm as the turntable, automatic mode.
This test is not a comparison or a test, it is completely different 3D scanners born for different targets and needs.
The model is deliberately open. The closed model will not be released so don't look for it. I prefer not to have problems with Mizuno. The model is therefore released as is for free and non-commercial use.
I'm curious what you think. if you have any questions please do not hesitate to do so, time permitting I hope to answer all reasonable questions.
instagram: BlackLakeLab
https://grabcad.com/library/mizuno-morelia-sala-classic-eu43-1